Self-Radicalization is a Leftist Oxymoron

muslim-boy-knife-1-e1504386318393-630x354

By  on September 4, 2017

Self-Radicalization is a Leftist Oxymoron

Self-radicalization is a Leftist oxymoron, it simply does not exist. Radicalization is an interactive social phenomenon.

Radicalization happens socially in Mosques.

Radicalization happens socially in cultural centers. Radicalization happens socially in prisons. Radicalization happens socially in schools. Radicalization happens socially in homes. Radicalization happens socially on social media. Radicalization is not a monologue – it is a dialogue with Islam and there are no lone wolves. Like the bogus Benghazi video, the lone wolf chimera is pure Leftist fiction created to quell public fear and deflect attention away from the clear and present danger of the spread of Islam in America.

Islam is an expansionist socio-political movement with a religious wing created 1400 years ago. Islam then and Islam now seeks world dominion – the establishment of a worldwide Islamic caliphate ruled by Islamic sharia law. The global spread of Islam has the immutable goal of world domination. Its tactics and strategies vary depending on the fluctuating economies that support the movement and the social forces that oppose the movement. The discovery of oil in the Arabian peninsula was a bonanza for the spread of Islam.

Western demand for oil and the spread of Islam increased in parallel trajectories. Islam went on a buying spree. Oil wealth purchased excessive power and influence in politics, academia, and the media. The Islamic expansion strategy was to target the three spheres of influence necessary to rebrand Islam as benign and dupe the gullible West into accepting Islam as a religion like any other. The greedy West was playing checkers – Islam was playing chess.

The Islamic radicalization most feared by the West is barbaric jihadi terrorism. Terrorism is arguably the most terrifying element of the spread of Islam but it is not the greatest threat to the West. The insidious indoctrination of the West toward Islam and away from its native Judeo-Christian traditions is the most dangerous and destabilizing. The pundits and politicians continue to ask the wrong questions. They keep asking about self-radicalization and lone wolves when the extreme threat is the ideological acceptance of religious supremacist Islamic sharia law in the West.

Vetting is not a matter of being Muslim – it is a matter of following sharia law. Any individual who embraces sharia law is an enemy of the state because sharia law is supremacist and does not recognize any law but sharia. The United States is a country governed by the tolerance and freedoms codified in our Constitution. Islam is a worldwide movement governed by the intolerance and supremacism codified in the Sharia.

Sharia law is diametrically opposed to Western secular law. Like any orthodoxy sharia provides strict and comprehensive rules for acceptable behavior and punishments for unacceptable behavior. The problem is that the behaviors sharia endorses include murder, rape, child abuse, pedophilia, homophobia, misogyny, slavery – these behaviors are crimes in the West but supported by sharia. Muslims who embrace sharia do not recognize the secular laws of the West so there is no possibility of living together in multicultural peace.

Peace for Islam is when the whole world is Islamic. Leftists who naively insist that Islam is a religion of peace do not understand this – they have been indoctrinated to believe in the rebranded version of Islam and are too arrogant to understand that Islam is Islam.

The Muslim Brotherhood, founded by Hassan al-Banna in 1928, remains dedicated to resurrecting Islamic governance based on Sharia law. The motto of the Muslim Brotherhood is “God is our objective, the Quran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, jihad is our way, and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations.” Their motto remains unchanged.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization designed to spread Islam worldwide and yet Obama invited them into the US government to make policy about our national security. It was Obama who ordered the purging of any reference to Islamic doctrine that would explain to law enforcement and the military the ideological inspiration for jihad. It was Obama who invited the Muslim Brotherhood in to Common Core to rewrite our educational curricula to glorify Islam and disparage Christianity. The Muslim Student Association is spreading Islam on American campuses. The Muslim Brotherhood is spreading Islam in the media by misinforming a naive public through programming that denies the threat and expansionist goals of Islam.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a greater threat to America than machete wielding jihadi terrorists dressed in menacing black costumes screaming Allahu Akhbar. The Muslim Brotherhood speaks flawless English and camouflages itself in Western clothing to blend in and appear benign. Thanks to Obama the MB has infiltrated every level of our government and operates freely in the United States to control the conversation about Islam and to disguise Islam’s expansionist intentions. Taqiyyah – the practice of lying in the service of Islam – is the language of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Ex-president liar-in-chief Barack Obama is responsible for the proliferation of the Muslim Brotherhood terror organization in America and for inciting the Leftist “resistance” movement including Antifa and Black Lives Matter toward anarchy. Obama is fluent in English, taqiyyah, and Leftist Orwellian doublespeak. He was the perfect puppet chosen by the globalist elite to bring chaos to America.

Barack Obama will go down in history as the first anti-American president to ever hold office. His presidential legacy is the Leftist/Islamist axis designed to destroy American democracy. His ex-presidential legacy is the “resistance” movement designed to make America ungovernable for President Trump.

Obama’s Leftist/Islamist axis was designed to destabilize and destroy American democracy by the globalist elite who finance and support radicalization. Radicalization provides the social chaos necessary for the implementation of their own globalist elite new world order of one-world government. Anarchy and the global instability created by the spread of Islam produces the terrifying conditions necessary to dupe the American people into surrendering their freedoms in exchange for false promises of safety.

The Obama leftovers remaining in government are sabotaging President Trump’s agenda to create chaos and make the country ungovernable.

The West Wing Democrats are eliminating all The President’s Men and isolating him from MAGA loyalists.

The Hussein Obama Team has positioned itself to take over the government if they can successfully overthrow President Trump.

President Donald Trump was elected to reverse Mr. Hussein Obama’s anti-American pro-Muslim course. The Muslim Brotherhood, the lethal weapon of choice in the spread of Islam, is creating worldwide instability and must be immediately designated a terrorist organization by President Trump and Congress.

President Trump must get control of his government and reverse the deliberate depopulation of staff loyal to his pro-American Make America Great Again vision. If not, the Leftist/Islamist axis will successfully create enough social chaos for the globalist elite to take over the White House and impose their own dystopian one-world government. That was the plan all along.

By Linda Goudsmit

Paul Ebeling, Editor

Self-Radicalization is a Leftist Oxymoron

Advertisements

Senate Judiciary Committee Confirms: Comey Cleared Hillary BEFORE Process Event

Posted by  | Sep 1, 2017 | 

1

 

The Clinton network of unscrupulous protectors is wide and deep. New information uncovered by the Senate Judiciary Committee shows that former FBI Director James Comey had determined to exonerate Hillary Clinton’s use of multiple private email servers weeks before all the witnesses had been interviewed.

President Trump fired Obama-appointed Comey in May. Critics, unsurprisingly, claimed that Trump was worried about the now-debunked Russia probe. In fact, the uproar over the dismissal was generally touted as a “grave abuse of power” and he was blasted by the liberal press. The reason cited by the president for the action was the mishandling of the Clinton email investigation. Now, the Senate Judiciary Committee has confirmed Trump was correct, yet again.

This isn’t the first time that the media has had to eat crow. Of course, they just ignore the fact that they were wrong and then move along to the next criticism. The Judiciary committee was investigating the so-called Russia involvement in the 2016 election, but according to reports, they had broadened the scope to include whether the President obstructed justice when he fired James Comey.

2

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat on the committee, confirmed this when he said in June, “our hearing will very much involve potential obstruction of justice in the firing of Comey and other actions.”

However, the investigation turned up something that democrats were not expecting. The committee used transcripts made during the Office of Special Counsel’s interviews with James Rybicki, Comey’s chief of staff, and Trisha Anderson, the principal deputy general counsel of national security and cyberlaw at the FBI to discover Comey’s behavior.

Although the information was heavily redacted, the facts were clear. Comey made the statement before most of the evidence had been gathered. Two senators on the committee wrote a letter to the FBI asking why Comey was drafting the statement of Hillary’s exoneration before 17 key witnesses had even testified, including Hillary herself.

3

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and a judiciary subcommittee chairman, Sen. Lindsey Graham blasted the chain of events surrounding the entire FBI probe. The letter was made public yesterday and included a scathing condemnation of former Director Comey.

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton,” the letter said.

It added, “That was long before FBI agents finished their work. Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership. The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts.”

4

Essentially the letter asked whether Comey could have performed a complete and unbiased investigation, given the fact that he was already writing the statement that would give Clinton a free pass concerning her highly illegal behavior as Secretary of State.

“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation,” Grassley and Graham wrote. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

They also said that the behavior of the FBI under Obama was wrong. “The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts,” they said.

Comey ultimately said that Clinton’s actions were “extremely careless,” but he announced in July that the Bureau would not recommend that the Justice Department pursue criminal charges against the then presidential candidate.

Given the rushed performance and the fact that Comey was busily doing his best to protect Hillary, the entire process seems more than contrived. Perhaps Comey was banking on the fact that Clinton would be able to control the election process and become president? That way, she could have easily swept away any unpleasantness discovered by congressional investigative procedures.

The amount of scandal surrounding Clinton, Comey, Lynch, and other Obama minions is so massive that each new revelation is like adding a gum wrapper to a landfill. The entire debacle concerning the FBI’s announcement, then another announcement that an additional 650,000 Weiner emails were discovered, and then another exoneration two days before the election for Hillary is just bewildering.

More than anything, it further indicates how strong the Clintons have been in controlling various members of the Obama administration.

The committee does not know whether specific agents were aware of the premature memos, but they have requested full disclosure for all related records from the FBI. The new evidence clearly shows that President Trump was accurate in his assessment of James Comey, and that his subsequent firing of such a corrupt individual was not only appropriate, but was long overdue.

Well, videos are working again. I was looking back on some of Alex Jones videos about Obama and his war on America and found this. Seems to coincide with what is going on today. And now we have McCain and other NeoCon Republicans wanting to start an unwarrented war with Russia, anything to complicate Trumps inaugeration and getting things done. So fed up with these Elite Warmongering Globalists!

Also found some history of Trump and Hillarys ancestoral lineage and found out they are 19th cousins, video below. As Ive stated before I don’t go to any church and don’t really believe in organized religion just because of my past experiences, but I do believe in God above and wish our society was more God fearing, because to me, its a total mess right now and is so divided. At any rate, I found this video quiet thought provoking.

I listened to a woman whom calls herself a Sane Progressive and found what she spoke about quiet interesting as well, alot of truth in what she said. Video also provided below.

 

 

US set to deploy 4K troops to Russian border – Cold War getting warmer?

I guess WordPress is censoring Youtube videos as I keep being told that the file type is no longer supported. Guess I need to go elsewhere and buy a domain, get back into building web pages and build my own site there. Pretty sorry this Administration wants to suppress truth. You can click the link at least still and go view the vid at its site.

The troops’ deployment coincides with the deployment of 300,000 NATO troops that have been on “high alert” since last month. Is this a sign that Cold War 2.0 will go hot in 2017?

Since tempers first flared in 2014, tensions between Russia and the US have nearly boiled over on more than one occasion. However, recent NATO and US army actions along with a surge in anti-Russia propaganda throughout the Western world, suggest that these tensions will only escalate in the months ahead. Last Friday, new US tanks and armored vehicles arrived in the Netherlands, where they will be deployed to a storage facility in the province of Limburg to serve as part of the Army’s “strategically prepositioned critical war stock.” These tanks and other military assets are intended for use by the US Army’s recently announced deployment of 4,000 American troops and around 2,000 military vehicles along Russia’s border. The deployment breaches the Russia-NATO Founding Act of 1997, which states that NATO would not seek “additional permanent stationing of substantial ground combat forces” in nations closer to Russia.

The troops and vehicles will be stationed on a rotational, yet permanent basis in several countries that border Russia, such as Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, and Baltic nations. Yet, the most provocative aspect of all of these deployments was the stationing of an American battalion in Poland near the border of Kaliningrad, Russia’s enclave in the Baltic. The deployment comes as part of a $3.4 billion new spending plan intended to boost NATO forces in Europe, authorized by the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The US military currently boasts over 62,000 soldiers that are permanently stationed in Europe. Gen. Frederick Hodges, the commander of the US army in Europe, said that “these activities are the embodiment of the United States’ commitment to deterring aggression and defending our European allies and partners.” However, considering the massive deployments that have already taken place in addition to those recently announced, it becomes increasingly difficult to peg who the real aggressor is – NATO or Russia.

The NATO build-up along Russia’s border has been on-going since the Ukrainian coup of 2014, when accusations of Russia’s supposed “aggression” first surfaced. However, this year has seen some major escalations on this front, suggesting that the “Cold War 2.0” could go hot if the right crisis emerged. In October, Norway announced plans to allow the US Marines to station within its borders for the first time ever amid concerns of Russian “aggression” despite that fact that Russia has not once threatened any Scandinavian country or NATO member. Then, last month, one of the most disturbing build-ups of all took place when NATO announced that it had placed 300,000 troops on “high alert” with plans to have those troops ready for deployment by next month. This provocative move then pushed Russia to deploy nuclear-capable missiles to its Kaliningrad enclave. Considering that this latest deployment of US forces will also take place next month, the pieces will certainly be in place for a potential and unprecedented escalation of hostilities between NATO and Russia.

Comment: The US-NATO’s deliberate provocation, at this stage in the Obama exit, is troublesome in that any active aggressiveness on the part of the West will try to tie Trump’s hands.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJd3p1AfhcY&t=0s
US set to deploy 4K troops to Russian border – Cold War getting warmer?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJd3p1AfhcY&t=0s

 

 

 

Putin Outfoxes Obama, Lies in Wait for Trump

Moscow laughs off the Obama administration’s sanctions and expulsions as feeble last gestures and promises to respond in kind.

Back in 2010, the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested a ring of alleged Russian “sleepers,” including red-haired Russian “Bond Girl” Anna Chapman, who quickly became a celebrity ex-spy. In the end, not much harm was done.

But on Thursday, President Barack Obama ordered a much more significant action against what was portrayed as a much more sinister plot. In retaliation for the alleged hacking of the Democratic Party in an effort to tilt the U.S. presidential elections to Donald Trump, 35 Russians were declared “persona non grata,” two Russian intelligence agencies were sanctioned, and a list of hackers was published. Residences in the United States where Russian officials and their children spent time relaxing (among other things) found themselves shut down.

The news arrived late in the evening on Thursday in Moscow, where it was not entirely unexpected, and the Kremlin immediately promised “a mirror response.” But then came the surprises.

On Friday morning, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the American accusations “have no grounds” and Russia would kick out 31 diplomats serving at the U.S. embassy as well as four more stationed in St. Petersburg. “They declared our dachas in Washington and with the UN mission ‘nests of spies.’ We suggest banning Americans for use of their dacha in Serebrenny Bor and their storage facility in Dorozhnaya Street.” All that seemed predictable enough.

Russia’s former president and current prime minister, Dmitry Medvedev, who received Obama in Moscow in 2009, the time of the “re-set” in U.S.-Russia relations, buried all hopes of improved ties with these guys. “It is sad that the Obama administration that began its life by reconstructing ties ends it with anti-Russian death throes,” Medvedev tweeted. “RIP.”

Russian officials had prepared the country for the worst, even before Obama announced the sanctions and expulsion.

On Thursday, President Vladimir Putin’s internet adviser, German Klimenko, warned Russians that their country could get “entirely unplugged from the world’s internet.” Earlier this week, the Russian Ministry of Communications worked on a draft of a new law “designed as a protective measure” for the most important state institutions.

The effect of such measures could well play into authoritarian hands, as independent political analyst Dmitry Oreshkin tells The Daily Beast: “Putin’s first move is to isolate Russia, separate people from the world with a USSR-style Iron Curtain, except that this time the curtain is designed against the freedom of internet information,” Oreshkin said. “In Soviet times, Russians were also told that there, on the other side of the curtain, the world is full of miserable liars.”

On Friday morning, Russia’s major television station, Channel One, featured footage of children of Russian diplomats having fun last summer in the U.S. summer camps that were now doomed, thanks to Obama. So the first of Moscow’s “mirror” responses hit children of Western diplomats. Russian news agencies reported that authorities closed the Anglo-American school in Moscow. The school taught hundreds of Western children, including the kids of the U.S., British and Canadian diplomats. The reports also said that the Kremlin closed down a U.S. embassy “resort” in Moscow.

And then… and then… judo blackbelt Putin pulled one of the most spectacular jiujitsu moves of his political career, announcing that Russia would not be punishing any American children or closing any American dachas. In a move that echoed Michelle Obama’s incantatory “they go low, we go high,” Putin announced: “We will not create problems for U.S. diplomats. We will not expel anyone. We will not prohibit their families and children to use their usual vacation spots in the New Year’s holidays. Moreover, I am inviting all children of the U.S. diplomats accredited in Russia to the New Year’s and Christmas celebration in the Kremlin.”

“While we reserve the right to respond, we will not drop to this level of irresponsible diplomacy, and we will make further steps to help resurrect Russian-American relations based on the policies that the administration of D. Trump will pursue,” Putin said in a statement.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin dismissed all the accusations described in the 13-page document with the colorful title “Grizzly Steppe: Russian Malicious Cyber Activity” (PDF), presented to Obama jointly by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and FBI.

The U.S. report detailed activities by the Russian intelligence services, mainly the FSB (formerly KGB) and GRU (military intelligence) collectively labeled RIS. It blamed the Russian government for sponsoring computer hacking attacks on the Democratic Party during the 2016 election campaign using cutouts labeled Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29 and APT 28, which have also been called Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear, respectively.

But almost all of this information has been on the public record for months, much of published by private security firms. A previous joint statement by FBI and DHS in early October (PDF) stated flatly that the U.S. intelligence community “is confident that the Russian government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations.”

GET THE BEAST IN YOUR INBOX!
By clicking “Subscribe,” you agree to have read the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
SUBSCRIBE

“These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the U.S. election process,” the American services stated—and remember, this was back in October.

But the case as presented was highly circumstantial, described as “consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.

“Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there,” the October statement continued. “We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

The joint DHS/FBI statement issued Thursday describes some techniques and details, but gets no closer to the proverbial smoking keyboard.

The Daily Beast spoke with a number of IT specialists in Russia who admitted that the hacker business was becoming profitable for thousands of young specialists on the “black Internet market.” Young IT students and programmers also are offered jobs in state “cybersecurity” companies. “These sanctions against FSB and GRU are a joke,” one of IT specialists working for the state told The Daily Beast on background. “These cyber forces are non-official; it is the same as imposing sanctions against ghost.”

Official Russian officials, for their part, did not want to hear about any evidence linking Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear hackers to the FSB or GRU. Obama’s new anti-Russian steps three weeks before Trump takes over at the White House were nothing but “a dead one grabbing and forcing his will on the alive one,” Aleksei Pushkov, a deputy of Federation Council, said on Twitter. The Kremlin insisted that the new punishment was just going to cause trouble for President-Elect Donald Trump, that the investigation against Russia is biased, political, and based on thin evidence.

Hours after Washington imposed the sanctions on Russia’s secret-service agencies and announced the expulsion of Russian diplomats from the United States, Maria Zakharova, spokeswoman for Russian Foreign Ministry, referred to President Obama’s administration as “losers in foreign policy, evil and ignorant.” Zakharova also said that by creating a diplomatic scandal with the Russia president, Obama “humiliated” the American people and added to the list of problems for Donald Trump to solve.

The conflict with Washington developed in the midst of a very important process—the Kremlin is sharing control and brokering peace deals with Turkey and Iran in Syria, where as many as 400,000 people have been killed in the civil war since 2011. On Thursday, the presidents of Turkey and Russia announced that the truce they had brokered without any participation by Washington was holding. International observers confirmed that it was calm in Syria on Thursday night, although there were some reports of fighting near Damascus on Friday.

The operation in Syria was a gesture that the Kremlin was planning to stage for President Obama, as a memorable goodbye.

Last month, Sergei Markov, an adviser to the Kremlin, told The Daily Beast: “Moscow is planning to take over eastern Aleppo during the period between the U.S. elections and the new president’s inauguration in a symbolical gesture to slap Obama in the face.”

Images of the Russian bear roaring at the American eagle illustrated articles about the new Cold War tensions in Russian media; Moscow insisted that, by putting pressure on Russia, Obama has inspired the new Cold War. There is no suggestion that Russian actions in Crimea and eastern Ukraine might have had something to do with this; no hint that Russia might indeed be playing a dangerous game of its own.

So this new Cold War continues to heat up, steadily undermining not only American democracy but such political openings as remain in Russia.

“Most probably the Kremlin is going to expel dozens of the U.S. diplomats,” Oreshkin told The Daily Beast before that announcement was official, then retracted. But of course that’s not the end of the game: “It will put more pressure on ‘foreign agents,’ NGOs like Memorial and Levada Center and on the U.S. representative offices,” said Oreshkin, and that suits the Kremlin’s purposes just fine.

with additional reporting by Christopher Dickey in Paris

Putin Outfoxes Obama, Lies in Wait for Trump

 

Putin: Russia will not expel anyone in response to US sanctions

Published time: 30 Dec, 2016 12:30
Edited time: 30 Dec, 2016 14:03
The Russian president has rejected a suggestion of the foreign ministry to expel 35 American diplomats in response to a similar move by the US. He said Obama’s act was designed to provoke a reaction, but Russia would not take the bait.

We reserve the right to retaliate, but we will not sink to the level of this irresponsible ‘kitchen’ diplomacy. We will take further moves on restoring Russian-American relations based on the policies that the administration of President-elect Donald Trump adopts,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a statement published by the Kremlin website.

58664093c36188c0188b45aa.jpg

Putin said that, unlike the Obama administration, Russia will not target foreign diplomats and their families days before New Year’s celebrations.

We will not forbid families and children from spending the New Year’s holidays at the places they are used to. Moreover, I invite the children of all American diplomats with accreditation in Russia to New Year’s and Christmas festivities in the Kremlin,” the Russian president said.

Putin said he regretted that US President Barack Obama is ending his term “in such a way,” but that he extended his New Year’s congratulations to the outgoing US president and his family nevertheless.

“I congratulate President-elect Donald Trump and the entire American people!” he concluded.

The Kremlin said it will send a government plane to the US to evacuate the expelled diplomats and their family members. Earlier, there were reports that the diplomats were having problems buying tickets on such short notice, with airlines already booked by New Year’s travelers.

 

Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov suggested that Russia respond to the expulsion of 35 Russian diplomats from the US by expelling 35 American diplomats from Russia. Similarly, the eviction of a Russian diplomatic staff from two vacation houses in the US would be mirrored by a similar eviction of Americans in Russia.

President Obama targeted Russian diplomats as a part of wider sanctions against Russian, which he justified by the alleged interference by the Russian government in the November presidential election in the US. Moscow denies the allegations.

The US claimed that the vacation houses had been used for espionage. Russia insists that they were used by the diplomatic staff to spend holidays with their families.

ALERT – 31 States Rise Up, DEFY Obama In Final Humiliation of His Presidency

Most of America has never liked the fact that Middle Eastern refugees have been pouring into this country and we are finally standing up to Obama on the issue.

By refusing to let Syrian refugees past their border, 31 states have defied Obama. This shouldn’t be a shock, considering America has watched Europe cripple under the weight of these refugees. (via CNN)

Out of these states, 26 of them have Republican leadership. The conservatives are very aware of the negative impacts that these Middle Eastern migrants have had on other countries, and they don’t want their state to end up the same way.

The states are from all corners of our country. Some are from south, like Alabama and Georgia and Texas, there’s states more towards the west like Arizona, and even northern states like New Hampshire, Maine, Michigan, and Illinois.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) stated, “Defeating ISIS involves projecting American ideals to the world. Governors who reject those fleeing war and persecution abandon our ideals and instead project our fears to the world.”

But this is rather ironic since CAIR has known ties to terrorist organizations, they want these refugees in America because of the terrorism that they intend to inflict on this country. They’re bringing their “war and persecution” and echoing it onto the American people.

As much as Obama refuses to admit it, there have been successful Islamic terrorist attacks on this nation during his presidency. The refugees in this country have only made these events more common, just as they have increased in Europe.

Although the states cannot stop the federal government from pushing these refugees into their borders, they can make it as difficult as possible and refuse to co-operate.

I’m sure Obama isn’t pleased about this, as it amounts to the states refusing to accept his vision of our country. The American people understand that Syria is a war-torn country and that their people are suffering, but bringing them here is not going to help matters.

Because we cannot properly vet these people, Islamic terrorists can just mill in with the rest of the refugees and inflict their hateful mindset on many more people. This is the goal of organizations like ISIS, to infiltrate our borders and destroy us.

When America went through the Civil War, foreign influence was minimal. Europe did send supplies to the Confederacy, but that was about it. They did not bring the unsuccessful people of the South over to England to live, they let America solve their own problems.

But now, that same mentality is “horrible” and “heartless” to liberals, so the American people are forced to make room for people who hate Americans and whose religion preaches for their followers to kill those who refuse to worship Allah. And the Democrats wonder why we don’t want them in our states? Is this a trick question?

ALERT – 31 States Rise Up, DEFY Obama In Final Humiliation of His Presidency