Video: Watch Tucker Carlson Take Apart a Top BLM Supporter Over White “Demand” List

My Note: I grew up in Poverty and am white, My Dad had to go from job to job after leaving the military trying to raise 4 kids and a wife. We got second hand shoes and clothes and ate bologna sandwiches and beans and lived in shacks most the time. I’d like to know what “White Privilage” is because being white, I never seen it growing up and never had that as an adult. These people are racist and this is flat out wrong! I dont fall within that “White Privilage” group and Im sure most hard working white people dont! They earned what they got and deserve what they have because they busted their hind ends for it. No one should be forced to give up what they worked hard for, if they want something, they need to go out and earn it like these “White Privilaged” people did! 


Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous dream was that Americans would be judged by their character, not the color of their skin.

Shockingly, it looks like that dream has been corrupted by groups such as “Black Lives Matter” — and they’re now obsessed with race in a way that would make Dr. King cringe.

That focus on skin color was made all too apparent in recent magazine article by Chanelle Helm, a BLM activist. In a barely literate rant published in LEO Weekly, the leftist organizer outlined a list of demands for “white people.”

That list included telling white homeowners to give their property to “a black or brown family,” as well developers to to provide free apartments to blacks.

“White people, re-budget your monthly so you can donate to black funds for land purchasing,” admonished one of the items on the list, while others suggested that people should be assaulted and fired for their opinions.

The blatantly race-baiting list caught the attention of Fox News host Tucker Carlson. While he was unable to book the author of the racist magazine article, he brought on an attorney and Black Lives Matter supporter named Jasmine Rand to debate the issue.

Tucker began by acknowledging that the Black Lives Matter movement may have some valid concerns, but questioned the usefulness of a race-baiting magazine article.


“It seems to me the one thing we don’t need at this hyper-charged, divided moment in American history is public figures encouraging more division, and encouraging us to think of ourselves as members of a group first instead of Americans first,” he argued.

“Here is the second recommendation for making the country better,” the host continued, referring to the article’s list of demands.

“’White people, if you’re inheriting property you intend to sell upon acceptance, give it to a black or brown family. You are bound to make that money in some other white privilege way.’ That is attacking people. Right? How can you be for that?” Tucker asked his guest.

Rand defended the clearly racist demand by bringing out the well-worn playbook of “white privilege.”

“Carlson, you and I both grew up with white privilege which means we didn’t have to think about race first while growing up,” she stated. “That’s not true for many African-Americans and for many Latino people, and I think we need to acknowledge that important and distinct difference.”

Tucker immediately stopped Rand, and pointed out that she was essentially making assumptions based on skin color.

“What you’re doing is making a generalization based on race. Which is the textbook definition of racism,” he said.

The Fox host then explained that assuming a person’s background based on complexion is inherently wrong.

“You are assuming that a person’s race is the most important thing about him,” he said. “There are plenty of white people in this country who grew up with no privilege at all and there are a lot of black people, including some of my neighborhood, who were very privileged and great people. A person’s race is not the important thing about that person. You seem to think it is.”

Pushed onto the defensive, the BLM-backing attorney tried to defend making racist statements due to the fact that some black individuals are poor.

“She’s making an extremely important point that it’s undeniable that still in our nation today, African-Americans remain some of the most unprivileged groups,” Rand said. “What she is calling upon white Americans —”

That’s when Tucker had heard enough.

“Hold on. First of all, she’s addressing this to white people. OK?” he responded.

“Which, by its nature, is divisive and I would argue racist, as if all white people have something in common and it’s meaningful. They don’t. At all. A recent arrival from New Zealand has nothing in comment with my kids. That the premise itself is false,” Tucker lectured.

“And yet, she is basically saying, give your house or your possessions to someone of a certain color. Again, she’s assuming that a person’s color is the most important thing,” the host continued, calling out the blatant racism. “Why would you want to be in the same world as someone like this?”

“You wouldn’t understand because you’ve lived with white privilege your entire life,” Rand retorted.

Tucker realized that the debate was going nowhere. “I’m trying to take you seriously, but I can’t,” he told the leftist guest.

The point may be completely lost on race-obsessed liberals, but Tucker Carlson’s take-down of “list” and its defenders is right on target.

Lumping individuals into groups based on their skin color, and then demanding that a certain color give up their property and money is not just racism… it is bordering on apartheid.

Nobody disputes that there are still great strides to be made, and that people of all races deserve greater opportunities and success. The American dream is universal.

By acting as if achievement is a black-versus-white struggle, a zero-sum game, people like Rand and Helm are undermining decades of progress.

They see life only through the lens of skin color, and that is the complete opposite of the post-racism nation to which we should aspire.

Like and share on Facebook and Twitter if you are fed up with race-obsessed demands.

How would you respond to these BLM activists? Scroll down to comment below!

Video: Watch Tucker Carlson Take Apart a Top BLM Supporter Over White “Demand” List



Politico: Donald Trump Will Close DACA Amnesty


President Donald Trump has decided to formally end President Barack Obama’s legally troubled “DACA” amnesty for 800,000  younger illegal immigrants, according to Politico.

The leak to Politico came from two officials, according to the Politico article.

President Donald Trump has decided to end the Obama-era program that grants work permits to undocumented immigrants who arrived in the country as children, according to two sources familiar with his thinking.

Trump’s decision will anger business interests, progressives, and the establishment media sector, and some business-friendly GOP leaders, such as House Speaker Paul Ryan. But the decision likely will be broadly popular among the majority of Americans.

Many polls show that Americans sympathize with the illegals, but also strongly prefer that immigration laws be used to ensure that Americans workers are not disadvantaged by the corporate hiring of cheap illegal migrants.

Trump is expected to combine his Tuesday announcement of the program’s demise with a call for Congress to pass pro-American immigration reform, such as the popular  Raise Actmerit immigration bill.

According to Politico:

In a nod to reservations held by many lawmakers, the White House plans to delay the enforcement of the president’s decision for six months, giving Congress a window to act, according to one White House official. But a senior White House aide said that chief of staff John Kelly, who has been running the West Wing policy process on the issue, “thinks Congress should’ve gotten its act together a lot longer ago.”

Read the article here.

The immigration reform debate is expected to stretch far into the 2018 election year, partly because many other issues clog up Congress’ near-term calendar. Also, Democrats and business groups oppose any reduction in the annual legal inflow of roughly 850,000 low-skill, low-wage workers.

Trump’s pending Raise Act reform would trim the inflow of lower-skilled immigrants who are now being brought into the country via “chain migration” family reunification rules. That reform would likely save $1 trillion in long-term aid, education, retirement, and welfare spending for every decade the inflow is halved, according to a recent estimate. That reduced taxpayer spending translates into lower revenue forecasts for business interests.

The Trump reform would also help many Americans and their children find better jobs at higher wages, business groups admit.

Since 2012, the DACA amnesty has provided work permits to roughly 800,000 illegal immigrants, including many who arrived in the 1990s. Their ages range from 15 to the mid-30s. Establishment media outlets describe the illegals as “children” or “kids,” but their average age is roughly 25. DACA supporters depict the migrants as productive and well-educated, but the available data shows the illegals’ skills are relatively low.

The decision to end DACA was driven by several factors. They included Trump’s campaign trail promise to close down the amnesty, and the broad consensus among legal experts — including Attorney General Jeff Sessions — that Obama’s Oval Office offer of work-permit to illegal violates the constitutional separation of powers. Also, a group of nine Attorneys General

Also, a group of nine Attorneys General is slated to file a lawsuit against the program on September 5.

Each year, four million young Americans turn 18 and beginning looking for well-paying jobs.

Each year, the government provide Green Cards to roughly 1 million legal immigrants. It also hands out almost 3 million short-term work permits to foreign workers. These permits include roughly 330,000 one-year OPT permits for foreign graduates of U.S. colleges, roughly 200,000 three-year H-1B visas for foreign white-collar professionals, and 400,000 two-year permits to DACA illegals.

The current annual flood of foreign labor spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate priceswidens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families.

President Donald Trump Sets Internet on Fire, Retweets Hilarious Slam on Hillary Clinton’s New Book



On Saturday evening, President Donald Trump set the Internet ablaze by endorsing a hilarious tweet trolling Hillary Clinton and the title of her new book, What Happened.

After spending most of the day helping survivors of Hurricane Harvey on September 2, Trump took a few minutes off Saturday night to fire up Twitter, as he so often does.

The president retweeted a message from a Trump fan account called Team_Trump45. It was a meme image featuring the cover of Clinton’s campaign autopsy book, What Happened. Next to the image of Clinton’s book cover was a similar but fake book cover with a large photo of a smiling Donald Trump under the words, “I Happened.”

Along with the president, the Tweet reached over 44,000 likes, more than 15,000 re-tweets, and 4,500 comments by press time.

The president’s endorsement of the hilarious jab at the former Democrat party banner carrier comes just ahead of Hillary’s book tour, which is drawing criticism before it even starts.

Last week news broke that the former Secretary of State and two-time losing candidate for president was charging $2,000 and more for an opportunity to meet her and get an autographed copy of the book during the book tour.

A “VIP platinum ticket” for a Sept. 28 talk in Toronto, Canada will cost a hefty $2,375.95. Similar pricing is available in other Canadian cities. General admission tickets, which are already sold out, went for approximately $70 each, according to Fox News.

Meanwhile, President Trump spent Saturday serving meals and meeting with victims of Hurricane Harvey in Texas.

Indeed, due to his warm demeanor and sunny optimism, one victim of Harvey said that after meeting Trump, she changed her mind about him.

On Friday, the president also pledged to donate one million dollars of his own money to Hurricane Harvey relief. Thus far, though, it isn’t known when or how that donation will be fulfilled.

President Donald Trump Sets Internet on Fire, Retweets Hilarious Slam on Hillary Clinton’s New Book

VIDEO OFF THE RAILS: California legislators – White Shaming, The New Rage On College Campuses

Reclaim Our Republic

OFF THE RAILS: California legislators may deal a SHOCKING blow to free speech

What do you get when liberals are in charge: sky-high taxes, reduced liberty, ever-expanding governmental regulations or ever-shifting definitions of morality?

Actually, all of the above. Liberals pass laws. Tons of them. It’s what they do, and in California, America’s most liberal state, even the most basic of rights — freedom of speech — may be going the way of the dodo bird.

From Allen B. West

A few days ago, we learned that the mayor of San Francisco was incensed because freedom of speech was going to be allowed in his city; and now the Golden State may take yet another leap of liberal lunacy.

If California legislators have their way, failing to use a person’s preferred pronoun — that is, not calling a transgender a “she” if he claims that…

View original post 1,888 more words

3 Ways To Defeat The ‘Tear Down Movement’

Reclaim Our Republic


Aug 31, 2017  by Larry Tomczak

Momentum continues across America to purge the public square of symbols deemed distasteful reminders of America’s past. Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who formerly hailed Richmond statues as “part of our heritage,” now lampoons them as “flash points for hatred, division and violence.”

Protesters in this “tear down movement” say they are protesting past injustices. The memorials are “racist, painful reminders that must go!” They site flaws of leaders to discredit them and as an indictment of an America “needing cultural cleansing.”

Activists target not only Confederate displays but presidents, founders, patriots, explorers and religious figures deemed “offensive.”

ESPN caved in by catapulting Robert Lee as a sportscaster due to his name! “Honest” Abe Lincoln’s flaws were excavated, so his 100-year-old bust was smashed, tarred and burned in Chicago. And Columbus’ 225-year-old statue was smashed in Baltimore to say “Kaput!” to his “covered up cruelties.”

View original post 1,671 more words

VIDEO FBI Antifa Domestic Terrorism Long Before RINOs Ryan, Rubio, Romney Declared ‘No Sides’ – End Their Politics

Reclaim Our Republic

1 Sept 2017 by Breitbart News

Politico reports that the Obama Administration “formally classified” Antifa’s activities as “domestic terrorist violence” as early as April 2016.

From Politico:

Federal authorities have been warning state and local officials since early 2016 that leftist extremists known as “antifa” had become increasingly confrontational and dangerous, so much so that the Department of Homeland Security formally classified their activities as “domestic terrorist violence,” according to interviews and confidential law enforcement documents obtained by POLITICO.

Since well before the Aug. 12 rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, turned deadly, DHS has been issuing warnings about the growing likelihood of lethal violence between the left-wing anarchists and right-wing white supremacist and nationalist groups.

Previously unreported documents disclose that by April 2016, authorities believed that “anarchist extremists” were the primary instigators of violence at public rallies against a range of targets. They were blamed by authorities for attacks on the…

View original post 1,245 more words

VIDEO Cops Drag Nurse Under Arrest For Protecting Patient From Unauthorized Blood Draw

Reclaim Our Republic

Nurse was defending unconscious truck driver who had been injured in hit-and-run accident

Shock Footage: Police Drag Nurse Attempting to Protect Patient from Unauthorized Blood Draw

1 Sept 2017 by  Shepard Ambellas

A Salt Lake City nurse has released police body camera and hospital surveillance footage which she claims shows her being illegally arrested back in late July after refusing police orders to draw blood from an unconscious patient.

Utah University Hospital nurse Alex Wubbels was in charge on July 26th when law enforcement officials arrived and ordered her to extract the blood of an unconscious truck driver who had been injured in a hit-and-run accident earlier that day.

Wubbels says she was just doing her job and was protecting her patient’s privacy when she was arrested and dragged out of the hospital by a Salt Lake City police detective, who the nurse says illegally arrested and assaulted her.

An analysis of the video confirms that on the day of the incident…

View original post 271 more words

Senate Judiciary Committee Confirms: Comey Cleared Hillary BEFORE Process Event

Posted by  | Sep 1, 2017 | 



The Clinton network of unscrupulous protectors is wide and deep. New information uncovered by the Senate Judiciary Committee shows that former FBI Director James Comey had determined to exonerate Hillary Clinton’s use of multiple private email servers weeks before all the witnesses had been interviewed.

President Trump fired Obama-appointed Comey in May. Critics, unsurprisingly, claimed that Trump was worried about the now-debunked Russia probe. In fact, the uproar over the dismissal was generally touted as a “grave abuse of power” and he was blasted by the liberal press. The reason cited by the president for the action was the mishandling of the Clinton email investigation. Now, the Senate Judiciary Committee has confirmed Trump was correct, yet again.

This isn’t the first time that the media has had to eat crow. Of course, they just ignore the fact that they were wrong and then move along to the next criticism. The Judiciary committee was investigating the so-called Russia involvement in the 2016 election, but according to reports, they had broadened the scope to include whether the President obstructed justice when he fired James Comey.


Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat on the committee, confirmed this when he said in June, “our hearing will very much involve potential obstruction of justice in the firing of Comey and other actions.”

However, the investigation turned up something that democrats were not expecting. The committee used transcripts made during the Office of Special Counsel’s interviews with James Rybicki, Comey’s chief of staff, and Trisha Anderson, the principal deputy general counsel of national security and cyberlaw at the FBI to discover Comey’s behavior.

Although the information was heavily redacted, the facts were clear. Comey made the statement before most of the evidence had been gathered. Two senators on the committee wrote a letter to the FBI asking why Comey was drafting the statement of Hillary’s exoneration before 17 key witnesses had even testified, including Hillary herself.


Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and a judiciary subcommittee chairman, Sen. Lindsey Graham blasted the chain of events surrounding the entire FBI probe. The letter was made public yesterday and included a scathing condemnation of former Director Comey.

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton,” the letter said.

It added, “That was long before FBI agents finished their work. Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership. The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts.”


Essentially the letter asked whether Comey could have performed a complete and unbiased investigation, given the fact that he was already writing the statement that would give Clinton a free pass concerning her highly illegal behavior as Secretary of State.

“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation,” Grassley and Graham wrote. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

They also said that the behavior of the FBI under Obama was wrong. “The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts,” they said.

Comey ultimately said that Clinton’s actions were “extremely careless,” but he announced in July that the Bureau would not recommend that the Justice Department pursue criminal charges against the then presidential candidate.

Given the rushed performance and the fact that Comey was busily doing his best to protect Hillary, the entire process seems more than contrived. Perhaps Comey was banking on the fact that Clinton would be able to control the election process and become president? That way, she could have easily swept away any unpleasantness discovered by congressional investigative procedures.

The amount of scandal surrounding Clinton, Comey, Lynch, and other Obama minions is so massive that each new revelation is like adding a gum wrapper to a landfill. The entire debacle concerning the FBI’s announcement, then another announcement that an additional 650,000 Weiner emails were discovered, and then another exoneration two days before the election for Hillary is just bewildering.

More than anything, it further indicates how strong the Clintons have been in controlling various members of the Obama administration.

The committee does not know whether specific agents were aware of the premature memos, but they have requested full disclosure for all related records from the FBI. The new evidence clearly shows that President Trump was accurate in his assessment of James Comey, and that his subsequent firing of such a corrupt individual was not only appropriate, but was long overdue.

“I Couldn’t Control Myself”: Judge Sentences Illegal To 15 Years After Evidence Presented

Posted by Anthony Cesario | Sep 1, 2017 | National Security

MY NOTE: (This is by far the most horrific article Ive read concerning children and  an Illegal Immigrant being in this country when they shouldnt have been here in the first place.  Anyone whom can do this to a child deserve more of a sentance than what she got but at least she got a good long sentance to think about what she did to that child and the others and hopefully to get intense mental help. I hope assuredly she is deported once she serves that time, she doesnt deserve the goodness of the American people here, was just sickened by this.)


Illegal immigration is a massive problem plaguing our country. Despite this, many on the left continue to advocate for policies protecting undocumented aliens from deportation. Because of this, innocent people are currently being harmed by people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place.

For example, an illegal immigrant living in Danbury, Connecticut, was recently sentenced to prison for torturing a young girl in her care after “nanny cam” footage caught her burning, beating, and dragging the helpless child. Specifically, Lidia Quilligana, a 32-year-old undocumented alien, was captured on video “holding the 3-year-old’s hands and legs to a hot stove, slapping her and dragging her around by [her] hair.” In addition to the 3-year-old girl, she also reportedly brutally abused two other 1-year-old twins. As a consequence, she was sentenced to 15 years behind bars.


In court, prosecutors struggled to hide their disgust. For instance, while addressing the court, Assistant State’s Attorney Warren Murray, stated, “the abuse occurred virtually every day that we have video for, [which is a total of 10 days]. While Lidia may seem petite, she was big enough to casually pick up a 3-year-old girl and swing her around by the hair, much like a track star swings a hammer. It was just so disturbing. I’ve never seen anything like it.”

Attorney Sharon Dornfeld was equally repulsed. “[Quilligana] tortured those children. There is no other way to describe it,” she told the court, noting, “there was an amount of sustained and depraved cruelty that I’ve never seen before. Every parent at some point snaps and does something to their child they later regret. The video shows this case isn’t even close to that.”

Kevin Russo, the judge presiding over the case, was also disgusted by the horrific abuse. “The punishment doesn’t even come close to fitting the crime,” he mentioned while sentencing Quilligana. He was particularly taken aback by one moment in the video when she let the 3-year-old girl out of a toy box and ordered her upstairs. When she complied, Quilligana violently slapped her in the face.


“As she turned up the stairs, you slapped her. For what?” asked judge Russo. She had already complied with your orders,” he pointed out, noting, “what it did was serve as a coming attraction for a horror movie.” He added, “it’s clear from her body language that (the girl) had accepted that beatings were part of her 3-year-old life.”

During the trial, Quilligana did her best to apologize to the family. “I couldn’t control myself,” she claimed, adding, “believe me, I loved those children with all my heart. I’m sorry a thousand times.”

But the victim’s mother, however, was not interested in an apology. “To be frank, I’m not the one you should apologize to,” she said in a brief statement to the court, noting, “you need to own up to what you did and serve your time. There is no excuse for your behavior.”

The children’s godmother added, “I can’t even fathom what these children went through that wasn’t caught on video. I can’t imagine spending day after day with this torture. These were all babies.”

Although Quilligana’s attorney, Jenn Tunnard, agreed that the abuse was “unthinkable, unconscionable and unfathomable,” she tried to blame it on her being abused as a child herself. ”Her father, who drank heavily, would hang Lidia and her siblings by their legs and beat them until they bled,” claimed Tunnard, who mentioned that she was simply disciplining the children the only way she knew how. ”While the public may see my client as a monster, she is really a sad person who lost control,” she explained.

Regardless of whether or not Quilligana is a monster or a sad person who just lost control, she shouldn’t have been in this country in the first place. After her 15 year sentence, she should be deported from the country. This is because no one should be harmed by someone living in the country illegally. While it’s true that not everyone living here unlawfully will commit additional crimes, since some will, letting them stay is simply not worth the risk.

Mueller reportedly working with top Trump foe, could end-run presidential pardon

By Brooke Singman

Published August 31, 2017


Special Counsel Robert Mueller reportedly is working with a top Trump foe — New York’s Democratic Attorney General Eric Schneiderman — in a development that could signal an attempt to get around the president’s pardon powers.

As reported by Politico, Mueller and Schneiderman have been in communication in recent weeks and have shared evidence with one another. The joint effort is significant for two reasons: Trump and Schneiderman are political enemies, and the prospect of a state-level probe creates a scenario where Trump’s pardon power would be blunted.

New York’s attorney general has long been fiercely critical of Trump. He has repeatedly sued or threatened to sue the current administration, and led the charge in the fraud case against Trump University.

Just last year, Schneiderman won a $25 million settlement in the Trump University case.

The president, for his part, repeatedly has called Schneiderman a “lightweight,” dating back to 2013.

Aside from the bad blood between the two men, the implications of state-level involvement are important.

Politico reported that Mueller and Schneiderman are specifically looking at former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort’s financial transactions. Manafort has denied wrongdoing, and Politico reported that no decision has been made on whether to pursue charges.

But if they pursued a state-level count, Politico notes this could give the special counsel’s team leverage over Manafort to seek cooperation — since Trump cannot pardon for state crimes.


New York Attorney General Eric Scheiderman  (Office of the Attorney General)

Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution gives the president power to “grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.”

And as the Justice Department explains, “An offense that violates a state law is not an offense against the United States.”

Trump last week announced the first pardon of his presidency, for former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio. It’s not clear how seriously clemency is being weighed for the Russia investigation, considering nobody has been charged in connection with the case.

The president repeatedly has described the investigation as a “witch hunt.”

Both the special counsel’s office and the New York attorney general’s office declined requests for comment from Fox News.

Mueller also has been criticized for hiring a team of attorneys with a history of political donations to Democratic candidates.

Schneiderman’s office reportedly is looking into Trump’s business transactions as well, which could be shared with the special counsel’s team.

Brooke Singman is a Politics Reporter for Fox News. Follow her on Twitter at @brookefoxnews.

Mueller reportedly working with top Trump foe, could end-run presidential pardon